The quality delivered by a product or company depends not just on the ability to generate ideas but also on the ability to test and iterate through them based on good feedback.

At a minimum, you should be able to communicate to your customers

Frequently – the more they reply, the more loyal they become

Easily – If it’s easy to do, chances are it’ll get done more often

Openly – let it be clear to your customers that they can complain or questions decisions, as their opinion is what matters

Right Context – Communicate to users as they use your product. The difference in what they say is remarkable. It’s time to stop the philosophical debate about whether investing in the experience of your customers is the right business decision. This isn’t a question of beliefs — it’s a question about the behavior of your customers.

Feedbackstreet can help you customize this experience and connect the right data to be able to quantify the impact of the difference between delivering a great experience and delivering a poor one — and to demonstrate to everyone in your organization just how big that impact can be.

Happy customers are a lot more likely to tell their friends. On average, happy customers tell nine people about their experiences with a company. But a single unhappy customer often means that there are many more

For every customer who complains, there are 26 customers who don’t say anything.

Angry customers gossip more than happy ones. Because while happy customers might tell nine friends, unhappy customers, on average, tell sixteen. That’s sixteen “anti-referrals” for every upset customer that you don’t make whole.

Offer a variety of online customer support channels (e.g., email, SMS, social media, web, etc.)

One area where this is particularly important is in the provision of help and support both pre-and post-contract to customers. Offering a choice of support methods, focusing on speed of response, and providing an easy resolution to issues is vital for brands wanting to ensure that their customers feel valued and listened to, whilst increasing their loyalty and appreciation.

Discover some of the success stories of OceanoBe customers and more information about our company and services following the link: https://oceanobe.com/expertise. 

OceanoBe - A blog article on Prioritize the priorities and how a successful customer feedback campaign can give your company access to knowledge and insight. 

Successful customer feedback campaign

Prioritize the priorities

In the ever-evolving landscape of software development, effective communication is the basis for seamless collaboration and innovation. As developers, we often find ourselves navigating the intricate world of API documentation, a crucial aspect that connects us to the inner workings of application programming interfaces (APIs). In recent years, markdown tools like Slate have emerged as indispensable allies, empowering us, the developers, to create clear, concise, and user-friendly API documentation.

APIs, the backbone of modern software development, provide a standardized way for different applications and systems to interact and exchange data. However, without comprehensive documentation, even the most meticulously crafted APIs can become a daunting labyrinth for developers. API documentation steps in as a guiding light, unraveling the complexities of APIs and facilitating seamless integration into our projects.

Markdown, with its lightweight markup language, has gained popularity over the last years for its simplicity and ease of use. Tools like Slate take markdown to the next level, offering a rich ecosystem of features tailored for crafting API documentation. Here's my take on why markdown tools are essential:

Enhanced Readability - markdown's syntax promotes clear and structured documentation, making it easier for developers to grasp key concepts and navigate through API details.

Code Integration - seamless integration of code snippets within markdown allows developers to visualize API usage and syntax directly within the documentation.

Generative Capabilities - Slate, for instance, offers generative capabilities that streamline the documentation process, allowing for the creation of API documentation from OpenAPI specifications.

Creating documentation that resonates with developers requires thoughtful consideration of both content and structure. Here are some guidelines for you to follow:

Define the target audience - identify the audience for the documentation, whether it's internal developers, external partners, or third-party users.

Use a clear structure - organize the documentation logically, using headings, subheadings, and bullet points to enhance navigation and readability.

Provide comprehensive coverage - ensure the documentation covers all aspects of the API, including endpoint descriptions, request and response formats, error handling, and authentication requirements.

Add code examples - relevant code examples illustrate API usage, making the documentation more practical and approachable.

Visual aids - diagrams, screenshots, and illustrations complement textual explanations and should be used to enhance the understanding of the documentation.

Regular updates - this is a no-brainer, but keeping the documentation up to date with any API changes ensures it remains an accurate and reliable resource for your co-workers.

If you are not a fan of markdown tools, I hope that by the end of this article, you will be. Markdown, initially developed by John Gruber in 2004, gained popularity for its simplicity and readability. As the years passed and the software development increased in complexity so did the demand for effective documentation tools. These tools leverage the simplicity of markdown while offering additional features tailored to the unique requirements of documenting APIs, such as interactive API explorers, code integration with syntax highlighting, and generative capabilities. This evolution reflects a continuous effort within the developer community to enhance the clarity and accessibility of API documentation, contributing to more seamless collaboration and innovation in software development.

But enough history, let's delve into some leading markdown tools specifically designed for API documentation that I think are very relevant at this point.

Of course, my first option would be Slate. In my opinion, this is a powerful Markdown tool that will be a great use for your API documentation. It features an interactive API explorer, code samples with syntax highlighting, collaboration and version control support, and a vast library of plugins and extensions.

Why developers use it: Slate is one of my main choices because of its comprehensive and user-friendly platform, streamlining the documentation process and enhancing usability for both internal and external developers.

Next is Swagger UI is widely used for generating API documentation from OpenAPI specifications. It provides a simple and intuitive interface for exploring API endpoints, understanding request, and response formats, and visualizing code examples.

Why developers use it: known for its ease of use, seamless integration with OpenAPI specifications, and straightforward approach to generating interactive documentation.

ReadMe is a more collaborative documentation platform that integrates with GitHub and other version control systems. It offers a centralized location for managing API documentation, facilitating collaboration among developers, and ensuring documentation remains up-to-date.

Why developers use it: the best part about this tool is its streamlined documentation process, collaboration features, and integration with version control systems.

Apiary is a comprehensive API documentation platform supporting various API styles, including REST, GraphQL, and SOAP. It offers advanced collaboration and version control features for managing complex API documentation projects.

Why developers use it: Apiary stands out for its robust feature set, support for different API styles, and effective collaboration and version control tools.

Markdoc is a versatile documentation tool designed for simplicity and ease of use. It primarily focuses on Markdown-based documentation, providing a straightforward platform for creating and organizing documentation seamlessly within the development workflow. 

Why developers use it: Developers choose Markdoc for its simplicity and emphasis on Markdown, a lightweight markup language. It integrates smoothly into the development process, offering an uncomplicated approach to documentation creation. This tool is also used by the Stripe payment processor.

SwaggerHub is a comprehensive platform tailored for API development and documentation. It serves as an integrated solution, offering a collaborative environment for designing, building, and documenting APIs. With a strong emphasis on the OpenAPI Specification, SwaggerHub provides tools for API design, testing, and documentation.

Why developers use it: Developers opt for SwaggerHub due to its all-encompassing features that cover the entire API development lifecycle. It facilitates collaboration among team members and ensures consistency in API design, testing, and documentation.

In conclusion, API documentation serves as the bridge between the intricacies of APIs and the minds of developers. Markdown tools like Slate, and Markdoc empower developers to create documentation that not only clarifies API intricacies but also fosters collaboration, innovation, and the continual growth of the software development landscape. In the end, the road you choose is up to your knowledge level and the requirements of the project.

API Documentation and markdown tools

API documentation serves as the bridge between the intricacies of APIs and the minds of developers. Find our list of preferred tools with pros and cons.

A comprehensive guide

In the age of data-driven decision-making, businesses are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of data. Traditional data storage solutions, such as hierarchical data warehouses, have limitations that make them unsuitable for modern use cases. This has led to the emergence of a new approach called data lakes, which provide businesses with a scalable, cost-effective, and flexible solution for managing and analyzing large volumes of data.

As the world becomes increasingly driven by data, businesses are looking for ways to make sense of the vast amounts of information they possess. One solution that has become increasingly popular is the data lake. In this article, I will explain what are data lakes, how they differ from data warehouses, and explore the benefits they bring to the table. We'll also take a closer look at the components that make up a data lake, best practices for building and managing one, common challenges when implementing a data lake, and tools and technologies you can use to implement one.

A data lake is a centralized repository that stores vast amounts of data in its native, raw format. Unlike hierarchical data warehouses that organize data in files or folders, a data lake adopts a flat architecture and leverages object storage to store data. Object storage stores data along with metadata tags and unique identifiers, making it easier to locate and retrieve data across regions, resulting in improved performance.

Data lakes are designed to address the limitations of traditional data warehouses. While data warehouses offer highly performant and scalable analytics, they are often expensive, proprietary, and incapable of handling modern use cases. In contrast, data lakes enable organizations to consolidate all their data in a single, central location without the need for imposing a schema upfront. Data lakes can store raw data alongside structured, tabular data sources and intermediate data tables, making them capable of processing all data types, including unstructured and semi-structured data like images, video, audio, and documents.

There are several compelling reasons to consider using a data lake as part of your data management and analytics strategy:

Open format: data lakes are built on an open format, allowing businesses to avoid lock-in to proprietary systems like data warehouses. This flexibility has become increasingly important in modern data architectures.

Durability and cost-effectiveness: they leverage object storage, which provides high durability and low cost. They can scale to hold massive amounts of data, regardless of type, without incurring significant expenses.

Advanced analytics and machine learning: unstructured data plays a crucial role in advanced analytics and machine learning. Data lakes excel at ingesting raw data in various formats, making them an ideal choice for organizations looking to take advantage of these technologies.

Despite these advantages, data lakes come with their own set of challenges. Lack of support for transactions, data quality enforcement, governance, and poor performance optimizations are reasons data lakes often turn into data swamps. To overcome these challenges and unlock the full potential of data lakes, organizations have started adopting a new approach called Lakehouse.

A lakehouse is a solution that addresses the limitations of data lakes by adding a transactional storage layer on top. It combines the best features of data lakes and data warehouses, enabling traditional analytics, data science, and machine learning to coexist within a single system. The lakehouse approach allows businesses to perform a variety of cross-functional analytics, business intelligence, and machine learning tasks, unlocking massive business value.

With a lakehouse, data analysts can query the data lake using SQL to extract rich insights. Data scientists can join and enrich data sets, enabling them to build more accurate machine-learning models. Data engineers can build automated ETL (Extract - Transform - Load) pipelines, simplifying data integration and transformation processes. Business intelligence analysts can create visual dashboards and reporting tools faster and easier than ever before. All these use cases can be performed simultaneously on the data lake, even as new data streams in, without the need to transfer or duplicate data.

Building a successful lakehouse with Delta Lake

To build a successful lakehouse, many organizations are turning to Delta Lake, an open-format data management and governance layer that combines the strengths of both data lakes and data warehouses. Delta Lake provides enterprises with a reliable, single source of truth, enabling collaboration and breaking down data silos. It delivers high-quality, reliable, secure, and performant analytics for both streaming and batch operations.

Delta Lake is designed to address common challenges associated with data lakes, such as data quality, reliability, security, and performance. By leveraging Delta Lake, businesses can build a cost-efficient and highly scalable lakehouse that eliminates data silos and empowers end-users with self-serving analytics capabilities.

Data Lakes vs. Data Lakehouses vs. Data Warehouses

To better understand the differences between data lakes, data lakehouses, and data warehouses, let's compare them across various dimensions:

As the table illustrates, data lakes accommodate all types of data, making them suitable for diverse use cases. However, they often lack reliability and ease of use, leading to data swamps. Data warehouses, on the other hand, excel at processing structured data and offer high-quality, reliable data but at a significantly higher cost. The lakehouse approach combines the simplicity and structure of a data warehouse with the broader use cases and flexibility of a data lake, providing businesses with the best of both worlds.

To ensure a successful lakehouse implementation, here are some best practices to consider:

Data governance: implement robust data governance practices to ensure data quality, security, and compliance. Define clear policies and procedures for data management and access.

Metadata management: establish a comprehensive metadata management strategy to catalog and organize data within the lakehouse. This facilitates data discovery, understanding, and collaboration across teams.

Data integration: implement efficient data integration pipelines to ingest and transform data from various sources. Use tools and frameworks that support both batch and streaming data processing to keep the lakehouse up-to-date.

Data lifecycle management: define policies for data retention, archiving, and deletion to optimize storage costs and ensure compliance with data privacy regulations.

Performance optimization: leverage performance optimization techniques, such as partitioning, indexing, and caching, to enhance query performance and reduce data processing times.

Data security: implement robust security measures, including access controls, encryption, and monitoring, to protect sensitive data stored within the lakehouse.

By following these best practices, businesses can maximize the value of their lakehouse implementation and empower their teams to derive meaningful insights from their data.

Data lakes have revolutionized how businesses store, manage, and analyze data. With their ability to handle diverse data types and their cost-effectiveness, data lakes have become a popular choice for organizations looking to leverage advanced analytics and machine learning. However, the challenges associated with data lakes, such as poor performance and lack of governance, have led to the emergence of the lakehouse approach.

A lakehouse combines the best features of data lakes and data warehouses, enabling businesses to perform a wide range of analytics and machine learning tasks in a unified and efficient manner. By adopting a lakehouse approach and leveraging technologies like Delta Lake, organizations can break down data silos, improve data quality, and empower their teams with self-serving analytics capabilities. As we learned here at Oceanobe, with t he right strategies and best practices in place, businesses can unlock the full potential of their data and gain a competitive edge in today's data-driven world.

Introduction to Data Lakes - unlocking the power of unstructured data

In the age of data-driven decision-making, businesses are constantly seeking innovative ways to harness the power of data. The solution is data lakes. 

What are data lakes, how they differ from data warehouses, and the benefits they offer

In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, businesses are constantly searching for innovative solutions to optimize their software systems. One such solution that has gained immense popularity in recent years is multi-tenant architecture. This architectural pattern enables multiple user groups, known as tenants, to access a single instance of an application or system. By sharing resources among different users, multi-tenant architecture offers numerous benefits, including scalability, cost savings, increased efficiency, easy maintenance, and customization options.

Multi-tenant architecture is designed to create distinct, isolated environments within a shared infrastructure, such as a virtual machine, server, or cloud platform. It partitions data storage and processing, providing each tenant with their own dedicated space in the system. This ensures that tenants can interact with the application and access their own data without compromising the privacy or security of other tenants.

Tenants can include various user groups, both internal and external to the company, as well as customers who purchase the product. This architecture allows businesses to customize each tenant's environment to meet their specific needs and preferences, including user interface design, data security settings, and access control. Different sets of rules can be applied to each domain, ensuring that resources and features are allocated appropriately.

One of the primary advantages of multi-tenant architecture is its scalability. By utilizing a single application instance to serve multiple tenants, businesses can easily scale up or down to meet changing demands. This flexibility enables companies to accommodate seasonal spikes in demand or adjust resource allocation based on customer needs without the need to manage multiple dedicated systems.

Multi-tenant architecture offers significant cost savings for businesses. By sharing hardware and software resources among multiple tenants, companies can reduce infrastructure costs. Instead of investing in separate systems for each tenant, businesses can leverage shared resources, resulting in lower overhead expenses. This cost-efficiency makes multi-tenant architecture especially beneficial for software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies, allowing them to scale their applications while remaining cost-effective.

With a multi-tenant architecture, businesses can increase efficiency by sharing resources such as compute power and storage space among multiple tenants. By leveraging shared infrastructure, companies can manage large workloads without the need for additional hardware or software licenses. This not only improves resource utilization but also enhances overall system performance and responsiveness.

Compared to single-tenant architecture, multi-tenant architecture is much easier to maintain and manage. All tenants share the same underlying codebase and platform, reducing the complexity associated with managing multiple versions of an application. Updates and upgrades can be deployed across all tenants simultaneously, streamlining the management process and ensuring consistency.

The multi-tenant architecture allows for extensive customization options. Each tenant can personalize their environment to meet their specific requirements, including user interface design, configurations, and branding. This flexibility enables businesses to effectively serve different user groups and tailor the application to their unique use cases. From filtering data based on different branches or locations to creating specified metrics and dashboards, tenants have the freedom to customize their experience within the shared multi-tenant application.

While multi-tenant architecture offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges that need to be addressed effectively. Some of the key challenges include:

Implementing multi-tenancy requires careful design and management to ensure tenant isolation and secure data storage. Poorly implemented multi-tenant applications can lead to unauthorized access and data misuse. To mitigate security threats, robust authentication and access control mechanisms need to be in place, ensuring that each tenant can only access their own data and features.

Managing a multi-tenant environment requires additional knowledge and expertise. Developers and administrators need to understand the intricacies of tenant separation, data filtering, and tenant identification. Documentation and resources should be provided to customers to help facilitate the setup process and address any difficulties or questions that may arise.

Multi-tenant applications heavily rely on the application provider for maintenance and upgrades. Any technical issues on the provider's side could impact all tenants, affecting service availability and system performance. To mitigate this risk, providers often adopt microservice architecture and leverage containerization platforms like Kubernetes to minimize outages and ensure the smooth operation of the application.

Multi-tenant architecture involves the efficient management of data storage for multiple tenants. There are several database models commonly used in multi-tenant systems:

In this model, all tenants' data is stored in the same database, utilizing pooled resources. This approach is cost-effective and straightforward, as it eliminates the need for separate databases. However, it can present challenges in terms of data concurrency and version control.

2. Single Shared Multiple Schema Database

This model uses sub-databases within the same database instance for each tenant. Each tenant schema is distinct and operated individually, offering greater flexibility in managing data specific to each tenant. However, this approach requires more overhead and maintenance due to the presence of multiple databases.

The third type of multi-tenant database model involves hosting data in multiple databases. This approach offers the highest level of data isolation, ensuring that each tenant's data is stored separately. However, managing and scaling multiple databases can increase complexity and maintenance efforts.

Real-World Examples of Multi-Tenant Architecture

Multi-tenant architecture is widely adopted across various industries, particularly in cloud computing and software-as-a-service applications. Here are a few examples of how multi-tenant architecture is utilized:

Public cloud platforms such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) provide infrastructure services to multiple users simultaneously. Each user, or tenant, can manage their own virtual machines, storage space, and databases within the shared platform. This multi-tenant approach allows for efficient resource utilization and cost savings.

2. Software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications

SaaS applications like Gmail, Dropbox, and Netflix leverage multi-tenant architecture to serve a large number of users concurrently. These applications provide a seamless user experience, allowing users to access their individual accounts and data while remaining completely isolated from other users. Multi-tenancy enables efficient resource allocation and scalability, ensuring optimal performance for all users.

3. Analytics and business intelligence platforms

Multi-tenant architecture is particularly relevant in the field of analytics and business intelligence. Analytical platforms like GoodData utilize multi-tenant architecture to enable companies to share dashboards and reporting capabilities with different user groups securely and cost-effectively. Each user group has its own isolated instance of the analytics platform, ensuring data privacy and customization options.

Multi-tenant architecture offers significant advantages for businesses seeking efficient, scalable, and cost-effective solutions. By sharing resources among multiple tenants, companies can optimize resource utilization, reduce costs, and enhance overall system performance. While challenges such as security and system maintenance need to be addressed, the benefits of multi-tenant architecture make it an attractive choice for businesses in various industries. 

As time has proven to us, here at Oceanobe, this can be a major undertaking for some businesses, that will resolve in business growth and expansion of opportunities. As technology continues to evolve, multi-tenant architecture will continue to play a vital role in enabling businesses to thrive in the digital era. 

The Power of Multi-Tenant Architecture in Microservices

Oceanobe blog | Multi-tenant architecture offers significant advantages for businesses seeking efficient, scalable, and cost-effective solutions. 

The benefits of multi-tenant architecture

The whats, whys, and whens of refactoring 

To understand the importance of refactoring we need to understand what refactoring is, why we need it and when we do it. 

Let’s answer the first question first. What is refactoring? If you do a quick google search on refactoring you quickly find this definition of it:

“In computer programming and software design, code refactoring is the process of restructuring existing computer code—changing the factoring—without changing its external behavior”

In Martin Fowler’s book “Refactoring Improving the design of existing code ” we can find another definition of it :

“Refactoring (noun): a change made to the internal structure of software to make it easier to understand and cheaper to modify without changing its observable behavior.”

Looking at these two definitions we can say that refactoring is the process of restructuring complex code into simpler, easier-to-understand code without changing its behavior. 

If we take a closer look at Martin Fowler’s definition we notice he says something about making code easier and cheaper to modify. This begs the question what does cheaper to modify mean? Well, the answer to this question is the answer to our second question Why do we need refactoring? 

Let’s say you work on a project, at first, feature development is a piece of cake, you and your team would deliver the feature quite fast. Then a few months pass and you notice that it’s taking longer and longer for a feature to be delivered or a bug to be solved. Code becomes more resistant to change, you make a small change in a portion of code and you suddenly see tests failing and the application crashes. Your client tells you that it needs a new feature to be delivered fast and then, in a panic, you press the magic combination of ctrl+c and ctrl+v, you duplicate the code, make small changes to make it work and after you merge your feature you decide to ”fix it later”. 

You’ve probably seen this picture or you might’ve ”felt” this over time. But what do you do when faced with this kind of context? For one you could ask the business to start a rewriting process since everything is a mess. You promise the client that this time you will use this new fancy stack or by rewriting you will surely bring value. Before bringing this forward, put yourself in the client’s shoes: Would you approve of such a lengthy and costly rewriting process? Would that bring any benefits? How long would it take until you can bring new functionalities in? Well, there could be a simpler answer to this: You refactor. You need refactoring to make the code simpler to understand and easier to change. 

This answers our second question as well, you need refactoring in order to:

Make the code more readable. The easier is to understand the code the simpler it is to integrate new functionalities and fix bugs. 

Reduce technical debt. Instead of pushing technical debt for later you ”fight it now” by doing simple refactorings. 

Understand the business better. Although not spoken about above, while refactoring you might find yourself some undocumented business cases that you didn’t know of. 

Reduce the support costs. By making the code easier to understand it might take you from weeks to days or even hours to fix a support ticket. 

Fix potential bugs. You might see yourself fixing bugs while refactoring, some bugs might stay hidden deep in your code without you even noticing until you refactor. 

Until now we’ve looked at what is refactoring, and why we need it. But when do we do it? The answer to this is short and simple: ALWAYS. Let’s have a look at what Robert C. Martin says in his book “Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship”: 

“The code has to be kept clean over time [...] The Boy Scouts of America has a simple rule that we can apply to our profession. Leave the campground cleaner than you found it. “

By following the Boy Scout rule we can apply simple refactoring techniques (i.e. rename variable, rename method, extract method) to keep the code clean. So whenever you find a code smell in the code you’re navigating, do not hesitate and refactor. This way we limit the technical debt. 

In this section, we’ve looked at what is refactoring, why we need it, and when to do it. Some key takeaways from this: 

Refactoring is the process of restructuring complex code into simpler, easier-to-understand code without changing its behavior.

We need refactoring to avoid technical debt and improve code quality, feature delivery time, and reduce support costs.

Always do refactoring, and try following the Boy Scout rule: always leave the code better than you found it. 

For this section I’ve created a small refactoring exercise, one can find it on Git Hub. We’ll look over this as an example of how to approach refactoring step by step.

Until now we’ve talked about what why and when we refactor, the next obvious question is how you refactor code. For this let’s look back at the definition of refactoring: 

In computer programming and software design, code refactoring is the process of restructuring existing computer code—changing the factoring—without changing its external behavior. 

The last part of this definition gives us a good hint on what to do as a first step in refactoring. The last part says that we should do refactoring without changing its external behavior. How could we make sure that when refactoring we don’t break or change anything? The answer to this is also simple: Tests. Make sure you have good code coverage before jumping into a refactoring process There are tools that could help you with this: 

A well-known tool is SonarQube. A team could set up rules during build time to check the code coverage so that a pipeline doesn’t pass until it has X% code coverage for example 

Something less fancy yet very effective is your IDE. The IntelliJ IDEA has an option to run tests with coverage. 

Back to our example as a first step, we’ll start by writing tests for the CarPark ingManager class. 

After writing our tests we’ll then use the Run With Coverage option from our IDE (in this case IntelliJ).

Looking at CarParkingManager we have good code coverage. Now we can start refactoring.  

After writing tests we can now look at what code smells we can find. The simplest refactoring one can do is Rename. Badly named variables can make the code hard to read. Let’s have a look at our CarParkingManager example. Looking at the parkCar method we immediately notice that the parameters are badly named: 

Looking at the diff we can see that our changes make the code a little bit more expressive. 

To perform this refactoring in IntelliJ one can hit Shift+F6 or right click on the variable/method - Refactor - Rename 

Let’s continue. Run the tests then commit! 

Continuing on our parkCar method we could say it’s getting a bit out of control. Whenever faced with a long method try splitting it into multiple method calls and refactor separately. To do so use Extract method refactoring. 

To perform this refactoring in IntelliJ one can hit Ctrl+Alt+M or right click on the lines you want to extract - Refactor - Extract Method 

Now that we’ve extracted our method let’s have a look inside our findAvail ableParkingSpotId. This sounds like a repository method to me. Let’s create one in the repository interface.

The method is looking good but it can be even better! It’s getting harder and harder to carry that if-check, could there be any way to avoid carrying it everywhere? What if someone forgets to add that null check? Well in Java the answer for this is Optionals instead of returning null try returning optionals. 

We’ve now ended with a method that has only a single call Let’s inline that to see what happens. After a few more refactorings the method looks like this: 

To perform this refactoring in IntelliJ one can hit Ctrl+Alt+N or right-click on the variable/method - Refactor - Inline Vari able/Method. 

Simple, isn’t it? Let’s run the tests and commit! 

Let’s turn our eyes to the printReceipt method, this is a big one. Similar to what we’ve done before, let's find out if there are any bad names. We can see that minutes are being used as a name but hours are calculated!? Let’s fix that by renaming minutes to hours. 

When doing so we've noticed that we had to change in three places, all three look the same!? Is this code duplication? Let's extract a method for the parking time calculation and our printReceipt method will look like this:

The code is still hard to read. We’ll make it better. Same steps as above, let’s see if we can improve the newly extracted method. At first glance, it looks like there is nothing we can do but we need to look deeper. 

The CarParkingManager class gets a ParkingSpot and does an operation based on a value inside ParkingSpot telling ParkingSpot what to do. This is called Feature Envy. We can fix that by moving the behavior back to ParkingSpot.

To perform this refactoring in IntelliJ one can hit F6 on the method you want to move and select where you want to move it from the popup. 

After moving the behavior inside our ParkingSpot model we’re left with this. Still, there are improvements to be made. We take it step by step. 

The next problem is that those if-else statements are hard to read, let’s replace them with a switch statement.

Method is still hard to read, let’s isolate the switch statements and see where that gets us. 

Oh, another feature envy, nice, we now know how to deal with that! Let’s move that to ParkingSpot.

Now if we revert that if condition and remove the redundant else after we’re left with a lot cleaner method.

A lot more could be done, but to keep it short we’ll stop here. You’ve probably noticed that until now we’ve repeated the same refactorings over and over and we’re left with a cleaner code. This is a very important aspect of refactoring. Try to take baby steps and not jump into a full guerilla refactoring. 

At the end, we’ll look at how to deal with booleans passed as parameters. Let’s have a look at addOrRemove car. Looking at its name we notice that this method does two things: adds a car and removes a car. This breaks the Single Responsibility Principle. 

In this case, we’ll have to make it work before making it worse.

Let’s extract two methods here: addCar and removeCar. Now whenever isRe move is set to true replace the call with our new remove car, similarly when it’s being set to false call the addCarMethod. 

The importance of refactoring

Examine in depth the refactoring's role in enhancing software design and maintainability.

Explore the essentials of refactoring in software development. Learn the what, why, and how of restructuring code for optimal clarity and efficiency.

Exploring the art of code improvement

In the business world, ideas are plentiful, but not all ideas are worth pursuing. This is where the proof of concept (PoC) comes into play. A proof of concept is a process that allows businesses to test the viability of a concept or idea before fully investing resources into its development. It serves as a preliminary test to determine if an idea has the potential to be successful and profitable.

Understanding the concept of proof of concept

A proof of concept is essentially a small-scale demonstration or experiment showcasing an idea's core functionality and feasibility. It aims to answer critical questions such as "does the idea work?", "is it technically feasible?", and "is there a market demand for it?". By conducting a proof of concept, businesses can gain valuable insights and make informed decisions about whether to proceed with full-scale development or pivot their approach.

Why is proof of concept important for business growth?

The proof of concept process is essential for business growth as it minimizes the risks associated with investing in untested ideas. By conducting a proof of concept, businesses can gather data and feedback, which helps in making strategic decisions. It allows businesses to validate their assumptions and ensure that the proposed solution aligns with the needs and expectations of their target market. Moreover, a successful proof of concept provides the confidence and credibility needed to attract investors, partners, and customers.

The benefits of conducting a proof of concept

Conducting a proof of concept offers several benefits to businesses. Firstly, it helps identify potential flaws or limitations in the initial concept, allowing businesses to make necessary adjustments and improvements. Secondly, it provides an opportunity to test the technical feasibility and performance of the idea, ensuring that it can be implemented effectively. Additionally, a proof of concept allows businesses to gauge the market demand and potential profitability of their idea, enabling them to make informed decisions about its viability and scalability.

It is important to differentiate between a proof of concept, a prototype, and a minimum viable product (MVP). While these terms are often used interchangeably, they serve distinct purposes in the development process. A proof of concept focuses on validating the core idea or concept, testing its feasibility, and gathering initial feedback. A prototype, on the other hand, aims to create a tangible representation of the final product, showcasing its design and functionality. Finally, an MVP is a minimal version of the product that is released to the market to gather user feedback and validate the business model.

Key elements of a successful proof of concept

To ensure the success of a proof of concept, certain key elements should be considered. Firstly, a clear and well-defined objective is crucial. The objective should outline what the proof of concept aims to achieve and how it aligns with the broader business goals. Secondly, a target audience should be identified to gather relevant feedback and insights. The audience should represent the potential users or customers of the proposed solution. Additionally, a realistic timeline and budget should be established to ensure that the proof of concept remains feasible and manageable.

Developing a proof of concept can be divided into several steps to ensure a systematic approach. 

Define the problem or opportunity that the proof of concept aims to address. This step involves conducting market research and identifying the pain points or gaps in the market. 

Brainstorm and generate ideas to solve the identified problem. This step encourages creativity and innovation. 

Evaluate and select the most promising idea based on its potential impact and feasibility. This step involves a preliminary analysis of the idea's technical, financial, and market viability.

A step-by-step guide through PoC in software development

In the context of software development, a proof of concept can be a valuable tool to validate ideas and technologies. Here is a step-by-step guide to developing a proof of concept in software development:

Identify the problem: Clearly define the problem or opportunity that the software aims to address. Understand the pain points and challenges faced by the target users.

Research and ideation: conduct thorough research to gather insights and identify potential solutions. Brainstorm different ideas and technologies that can be used to solve the identified problem.

Prototype development: create a basic prototype or mockup of the software to showcase its core functionality. This prototype should be simple and focused on validating the key features and user experience.

Testing and feedback: test the prototype with a small group of users or stakeholders. Gather feedback and insights to understand how well the software addresses the identified problem and meets user expectations.

Iterate and refine: based on the feedback received, iterate and refine the prototype. Make necessary adjustments and improvements to enhance the software's functionality and usability.

Evaluation and decision-making: evaluate the results of the PoC and determine whether the software is viable for further development. Consider factors such as technical feasibility, market demand, and potential return on investment.

Keep in mind that the main goal of a PoC is to validate if a concept is feasible, so it's essential not to overextend resources or time. It should remain a relatively quick and cost-effective way to test an idea before diving into more in-depth phases like prototyping or MVP development.

Common challenges in implementing a proof of concept

While the proof of concept process can be highly beneficial, it is not without its challenges. One common challenge is the lack of resources, both financial and human, to execute the proof of concept effectively. Limited budgets and manpower can hinder the ability to conduct thorough research, develop prototypes, and gather sufficient data. Another challenge is the resistance to change within the organization. Implementing a proof of concept may require a shift in mindset and processes, which can be met with resistance from stakeholders. Additionally, ensuring the scalability and compatibility of the proof of concept with existing systems and infrastructure can be a challenge.

To ensure a successful proof of concept implementation, consider the following tips:

Clearly define objectives: clearly define the objectives and expected outcomes of the proof of concept. This will provide a clear direction and focus for the process.

Collaborate with stakeholders: involve key stakeholders throughout the proof of concept process. Their input and feedback will provide valuable insights and increase buy-in.

Manage expectations: set realistic expectations for the proof of concept. Clearly communicate what it aims to achieve and what it does not. This will prevent misunderstandings and disappointment.

Document and analyze data: document all data and feedback gathered during the proof of concept. Analyze the data to draw meaningful insights and make informed decisions.

Iterate and refine: use the feedback and insights gathered during the proof of concept to iterate and refine the concept. Continuously improve and enhance the idea based on the learnings.

Conclusion: Leveraging proof of concept for business success

The proof of concept process is a valuable tool for businesses seeking growth and innovation. It allows businesses to test the viability of their ideas, gather feedback, and make informed decisions. Here at Oceanobe, we have successfully implemented many proof-of-concept ideas that were later transformed into successful MVPs and products. What we can say is that by conducting a proof of concept, businesses can minimize risks, identify potential flaws, and validate their assumptions. It serves as a stepping stone towards successful development and implementation. When implemented effectively, the proof of concept process can be a driving force behind business success and growth.

The proof of concept (PoC) process for business growth

The Proof of Concept Process for Business Growth Introduction to proof of concept, benefits, and a step-by-step guide through PoC in software development. 

Prioritize the priorities

Do you want to read more?

Subscribe now for our bimonthly newsletter!